PING G400 Max (2017) Driver Specs

PING G400 Max Driver spec guide

The PING G400 Max is a driver launched around 2017. Key listed specs include 9; 10.5° loft, 45.75 in length, 460 cc head. This sits at the large end of PING driver heads in the dataset. All else equal, a larger head usually gives the designer more room to push stability and forgiveness across the face.

2017Launch
DriverClub type
Large headLonger build
AT A GLANCE

Key specifications

Loft9; 10.5°
Length45.75 in
Head size460 cc
SwingweightD3
SPEC TENDENCY MAP

What kind of driver is the PING G400 Max?

These are geometry/spec tendencies, not measured launch-monitor performance. The middle shaded band is the typical 35th–65th percentile zone.

Loft tendency9.8 °
Lower launch biasEasier launch bias
Typical • 41st percentile among PING drivers
Head size460 cc
Compact headLarger head
Very high • 99th percentile among PING drivers
Shaft length45.75 in
More control lengthMore speed length
High • 80th percentile among PING drivers
FIT TAKEAWAY

Who might the PING G400 Max suit?

Likely worth a look if…

  • Golfers who like a larger, confidence-inspiring driver profile.
Things to watch

  • The relatively long build may add speed potential but can make strike consistency harder for some players.
DATABASE COMPARISON

How the PING G400 Max compares

Percentiles compare this model only with PING drivers that have the same field available. Multi-loft models use the mean listed loft for the comparison marker.

Head sizeVery high

460 cc

99
0th25th50th75th100th

This sits at the large end of PING driver heads in the dataset. All else equal, a larger head usually gives the designer more room to push stability and forgiveness across the face.

LoftTypical

9.8 °

41
0th25th50th75th100th

This specification sits near the middle of comparable PING models in the dataset.

Standard lengthHigh

45.75 in

80
0th25th50th75th100th

This is long for a PING driver. Extra length can add clubhead-speed potential, but it can also make center-face contact and directional control harder for some golfers.

PING G400 Max build profile

HEAD • FIT • COMPONENTS
Club typeDriver
HandednessRH/LH
SwingweightD3

Model information

Launch year 2017
Club type Driver
Market USA
U.S. status historical/discontinued
Handedness RH/LH

Club specifications

Loft options 9; 10.5°
Standard length 45.75 in
Head size 460 cc
Swingweight D3
USEFUL QUESTIONS

PING G400 Max FAQ

Is the PING G400 Max designed more for easy launch or a lower flight?+

The representative listed loft is 9.8 °, which sits around the 41st percentile among PING drivers with this field available. This specification sits near the middle of comparable PING models in the dataset.

How forgiving-looking is the PING G400 Max head size?+

The representative listed head size is 460 cc, which sits around the 99th percentile among PING drivers with this field available. This sits at the large end of PING driver heads in the dataset. All else equal, a larger head usually gives the designer more room to push stability and forgiveness across the face.

Is the PING G400 Max driver length easy to control?+

The representative listed standard length is 45.75 in, which sits around the 80th percentile among PING drivers with this field available. This is long for a PING driver. Extra length can add clubhead-speed potential, but it can also make center-face contact and directional control harder for some golfers.

Which PING G400 Max loft should I choose?+

The listed loft choices are 9; 10.5°. Pick loft from your launch, spin, attack angle and strike — not ego. If you launch it low or lose carry, the higher loft is usually the smarter test; if you already launch/spin it high, test the lower options.

How old is the PING G400 Max?+

The audited record places its launch around 2017. That makes it roughly 9 years old in 2026. Condition, shaft integrity and whether the club was altered since new can matter as much as the original spec sheet on an older club.

Specification note: PING specifications can vary by generation, loft, shaft, market, fitting configuration and custom order. Historical models may be documented only by surviving catalog, retailer or observed-club evidence. Blank fields are intentionally left blank rather than guessed. Verify critical fitting or purchase details against an official PING specification source where available. Primary researched source.

Ernie

Ernie loves documenting interesting facts about golf.

Recent Posts