The PING G400 LST is a driver launched around 2017. Key listed specs include 8.5; 10° loft, 45.75 (ALTA CB55); 45.25 (Tour/aftermarket) length, 445 cc head. This is a compact PING driver head by dataset standards. It may appeal to players who prefer a smaller look, but head size alone does not tell you the actual MOI or forgiveness.
Key specifications
What kind of driver is the PING G400 LST?
These are geometry/spec tendencies, not measured launch-monitor performance. The middle shaded band is the typical 35th–65th percentile zone.
Who might the PING G400 LST suit?
- Faster or naturally high-launch players shopping lower-loft options.
- The relatively long build may add speed potential but can make strike consistency harder for some players.
- The low-loft bias can be demanding if you already struggle to launch the driver.
How the PING G400 LST compares
Percentiles compare this model only with PING drivers that have the same field available. Multi-loft models use the mean listed loft for the comparison marker.
445 cc
This is a compact PING driver head by dataset standards. It may appeal to players who prefer a smaller look, but head size alone does not tell you the actual MOI or forgiveness.
9.2 °
The loft options lean low versus other PING drivers here. That generally points toward a flatter, lower-spin flight than a higher-loft setup, assuming the same delivery.
48.67 in
This is long for a PING driver. Extra length can add clubhead-speed potential, but it can also make center-face contact and directional control harder for some golfers.
208 g
The head is heavy for a PING driver in this dataset. That can create a more substantial head feel and may raise swingweight unless shaft length or component weight offsets it.
PING G400 LST build profile
Model information
| Launch year | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Club type | Driver |
| Market | USA |
| U.S. status | historical/discontinued |
Club specifications
| Loft options | 8.5; 10° |
|---|---|
| Standard length | 45.75 (ALTA CB55); 45.25 (Tour/aftermarket) |
| Head size | 445 cc |
| Head weight | 208 g |
| Swingweight | D4 |
Stock components
| Shaft | PING ALTA CB55 stock |
|---|
PING G400 LST FAQ
Is the PING G400 LST designed more for easy launch or a lower flight?+
The representative listed loft is 9.2 °, which sits around the 16th percentile among PING drivers with this field available. The loft options lean low versus other PING drivers here. That generally points toward a flatter, lower-spin flight than a higher-loft setup, assuming the same delivery.
How forgiving-looking is the PING G400 LST head size?+
The representative listed head size is 445 cc, which sits around the 10th percentile among PING drivers with this field available. This is a compact PING driver head by dataset standards. It may appeal to players who prefer a smaller look, but head size alone does not tell you the actual MOI or forgiveness.
Is the PING G400 LST driver length easy to control?+
The representative listed standard length is 48.67 in, which sits around the 99th percentile among PING drivers with this field available. This is long for a PING driver. Extra length can add clubhead-speed potential, but it can also make center-face contact and directional control harder for some golfers.
Which PING G400 LST loft should I choose?+
The listed loft choices are 8.5; 10°. Pick loft from your launch, spin, attack angle and strike — not ego. If you launch it low or lose carry, the higher loft is usually the smarter test; if you already launch/spin it high, test the lower options.
How old is the PING G400 LST?+
The audited record places its launch around 2017. That makes it roughly 9 years old in 2026. Condition, shaft integrity and whether the club was altered since new can matter as much as the original spec sheet on an older club.
What shaft was listed for the PING G400 LST?+
The researched record lists PING ALTA CB55 stock. That does not prove every surviving club has that shaft: custom orders and later reshafts are common, so check the actual shaft label before buying used.
Specification note: PING specifications can vary by generation, loft, shaft, market, fitting configuration and custom order. Historical models may be documented only by surviving catalog, retailer or observed-club evidence. Blank fields are intentionally left blank rather than guessed. Verify critical fitting or purchase details against an official PING specification source where available.