The PING Glide 2.0 is a wedge launched around 2017. Key listed specs include 46, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60° loft, 35.5 (46-52); 35.25 (54-56); 35 (58-60) length.
Key specifications
How the PING Glide 2.0 compares
Percentiles compare this model only with PING wedges that have the same field available. Multi-loft models use the mean listed loft for the comparison marker.
53.7 °
This specification sits near the middle of comparable PING models in the dataset.
PING Glide 2.0 build profile
Model information
| Launch year | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Club type | Wedge |
| Market | USA |
| U.S. status | historical/discontinued |
Club specifications
| Loft options | 46, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60° |
|---|---|
| Standard length | 35.5 (46-52); 35.25 (54-56); 35 (58-60) |
| Lie angle | 64 (46-52); 64.25 (54-56); 64.5 (58-60) |
| Bounce | SS 46-56:12; SS 58-60:10; WS 56-60:14; TS 58-60:6; ES 54-60:8 |
| Swingweight | D2-D4 |
PING Glide 2.0 FAQ
Is the PING Glide 2.0 better suited to soft or firm turf?+
Bounce is not fully documented. Higher bounce generally resists digging in softer conditions; lower bounce usually sits tighter on firm turf.
What role does the PING Glide 2.0 loft fit?+
The representative listed loft is 53.7 °, which sits around the 50th percentile among PING wedges with this field available. This specification sits near the middle of comparable PING models in the dataset.
Is the PING Glide 2.0 bounce forgiving for a steep swing?+
The bounce figure is unavailable. For a steep delivery, enough effective bounce and sole width generally matter more than chasing a specific model name.
How old is the PING Glide 2.0?+
The audited record places its launch around 2017. That makes it roughly 9 years old in 2026. Condition, shaft integrity and whether the club was altered since new can matter as much as the original spec sheet on an older club.
Specification note: PING specifications can vary by generation, loft, shaft, market, fitting configuration and custom order. Historical models may be documented only by surviving catalog, retailer or observed-club evidence. Blank fields are intentionally left blank rather than guessed. Verify critical fitting or purchase details against an official PING specification source where available. Primary researched source.