The PING G410 is a fairway wood launched around 2019. Key listed specs include 3W:14.5; 5W:17.5; 7W:20.5; 9W:23.5 loft, 3W:43; 5W:42.5; 7W:42; 9W:41.5 length.
Key specifications
How the PING G410 compares
Percentiles compare this model only with PING fairway woods that have the same field available. Multi-loft models use the mean listed loft for the comparison marker.
12.5 °
The listed loft is on the higher side for PING fairway woods, generally making launch easier and producing a steeper, more stopping flight than lower-loft woods.
PING G410 build profile
Model information
| Launch year | 2019 |
|---|---|
| Club type | Fairway wood |
| Market | USA |
| U.S. status | historical/discontinued |
Club specifications
| Loft options | 3W:14.5; 5W:17.5; 7W:20.5; 9W:23.5 |
|---|---|
| Standard length | 3W:43; 5W:42.5; 7W:42; 9W:41.5 |
| Lie angle | 3W:56.5; 5W:57; 7W:57.5; 9W:58 |
| Swingweight | D1 |
PING G410 FAQ
Is the PING G410 more of a distance or easy-launch fairway wood?+
The representative listed loft is 12.5 °, which sits around the 67th percentile among PING fairway woods with this field available. The listed loft is on the higher side for PING fairway woods, generally making launch easier and producing a steeper, more stopping flight than lower-loft woods.
Is the PING G410 long for a PING fairway wood?+
The length is not fully documented in this record.
Would the PING G410 be easier from the tee or turf?+
The spec sheet alone cannot prove turf-versus-tee performance. Loft and length can hint at the role, but sole design, CG, face depth and your delivery matter too. Use the comparison above as a geometry guide, not a performance test.
How old is the PING G410?+
The audited record places its launch around 2019. That makes it roughly 7 years old in 2026. Condition, shaft integrity and whether the club was altered since new can matter as much as the original spec sheet on an older club.
Specification note: PING specifications can vary by generation, loft, shaft, market, fitting configuration and custom order. Historical models may be documented only by surviving catalog, retailer or observed-club evidence. Blank fields are intentionally left blank rather than guessed. Verify critical fitting or purchase details against an official PING specification source where available. Primary researched source.